My family and I went on two mini-vacations this month.
One to the ocean. One to the mountains. Because of the way vacation schedules
lined up, these two vacations were back-to-back which provided quite the
contrast to consider. While in the mountains I got to thinking about the impact
geography can have on my sense of well-being and overall peacefulness.
My place of peace is the ocean. Without. A. doubt. I love
(LOVE!) the sea. I can play in the waves
and be perfectly content. I can sit on the shore and be perfectly content. I
can hang out on the pier and be perfectly content. I can. . . well, you get the
picture. What makes me
feel the most at peace when I’m in view of the ocean is that the ocean is the place where I feel God most tangibly.
The sea demonstrates to me so many of God’s attributes
that I can’t help but love it.
Then there are the mountains; mountains are not my place
of peace.
For some reason I do not feel that connection to the
mountains though many people feel God most tangibly there.
The mountains cause me to feel nauseated {Winding roads!
No thanks.}
I feel lost. I have a pitiful sense of direction on flat land. I’m
helpless in the mountains. North? Oh, you mean straight ahead. That must be
north.
And all I want to
do is eat. My own case of altitude
sickness?
I just can’t help
but be amazed at how much of a distinction I feel between the two types of
geography. I appreciate that God
connects to each of us in unique ways. And I love that He chose to connect with
me through the ocean.
So how about you?
Are you a mountain person? An ocean person? Where do you feel most connected
with God? I’d love to hear your answers. :)
Since I have lived most of my life in the Midwest, I will take either! I love them both. The ocean is calming, but since I am not a strong swimmer, it terrifies me a bit and I won't go where I can't see my feet. The mountains have snow, which I do not like. I loved when I lived in AZ and could always see "the foothills" (they were mountains to me).
ReplyDelete